CBSE’s credibility has unraveled in public, with blurred answer sheets, a revaluation portal that flipped fees from Re 1 to ₹69,420 in an afternoon, and a circular admitting "unauthorised interference". Pradhan has brought four PSU banks and IIT Madras/Kanpur teams in to fix the portal mid-cycle. An independent researcher separately published a walkthrough showing the same portal could be broken into by anyone with a web browser. Meanwhile, upGrad has filed for CCI approval on its Unacademy buy at roughly 90% below the 2021 peak, Allen is going from 43 cities to 78 ahead of an IPO, and PhysicsWallah picked up Punjab’s first digital university licence. NTA has told Parliament that NEET wasn’t really leaked, French and German teachers are being pushed out of classrooms by the three-language rollout, and a fresh US Green Card memo is rerouting Indian students to Germany and Ireland.

I’d love to hear what you think. Push back, agree, or share what I missed. Drop me a note at me@sandeepmallareddy.com. And if this is worth a spot in your inbox every week, go ahead and subscribe


Spotlight

CBSE Grade 12 woes continue

CBSE’s first full-scale rollout of On-Screen Marking has unraveled in the open. The post-result portal opened on May 19 for verification, scanned answer books and re-evaluation, with the board promising lower fees and a smoother process: ₹100 for a scanned copy down from ₹700, ₹100 for verification down from ₹500, and ₹25 per question for re-checking. Within hours, students were posting screenshots of failed logins, "site under maintenance" errors and deducted payments showing as failed transactions. Controller of Examinations Sanyam Bhardwaj initially insisted the portal was "functioning properly", told PTI he had himself submitted a dummy application successfully, and asked students to restart their computers.

That insistence did not survive the week. By May 20, the Answer Book portal was down again with technical glitches and CBSE had to push the application deadline. By May 21, students were sharing blurred scanned answer sheets they say they cannot read themselves and asking how teachers could have evaluated copies that were illegible. The same day, parents tagged CBSE with screenshots of payments that went through while the portal still showed "payment failed". CBSE then had to publicly deny that it was using AI in evaluation, clarifying that OSM changes only the surface evaluators look at and that the marking scheme remains unchanged.

On May 22, the revaluation fee on the portal flipped from Re 1 to ₹69.67 to ₹8,000 to ₹69,420 per subject within a single afternoon, with one student posting that "your site was hacked, students were scammed". The same day, Bhardwaj signed a circular extending the deadline from May 23 to May 24, admitting that the CBSE website "has been facing unprecedented traffic since the past few days and has also faced several attempts of unauthorised interference, which has made it prone to disruptions".

The admission landed awkwardly against the board’s posture days earlier. CBSE’s May 18 OSM FAQ had rejected the blurred-images allegation by pointing to a three-level scanning quality check, clarified that examiners and not computers were checking answers, and dismissed claims of stricter marking.

By May 24, Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan had walked into Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s office and asked for a complete overhaul of the CBSE payment gateway with SBI, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank and Indian Bank stepping in, and asked IIT Madras and IIT Kanpur teams to fix portal stability, server performance and login authentication. A system that CBSE spent the spring preparing for, with a 4 lakh-viewer live webcast in February, a mass mock evaluation across five slots, and marking schemes uploaded for all 116 subjects, is now being audited mid-cycle by two engineering institutes.

What turned out to be running underneath the chaos was a portal that was structurally insecure. The same day CBSE was extending its deadline, Class 12 student and cybersecurity researcher Nisarga Adhikary published a walkthrough showing the OnMark evaluation portal CBSE uses could be broken into by almost anyone with a web browser: a single master password was sitting in plain text inside the site’s own publicly readable code, and the OTP that was supposed to act as a second security check was being sent to the user’s own browser to verify, which is roughly the same as asking the candidate to mark their own paper. With those flaws and a few related ones, a stranger could take over any examiner’s account and edit marks; Adhikary says he reported the bugs to CERT-In in late February and most went unpatched for months. Adhikary writes that the platform "seems" to have been built by Coempt EduTeck Pvt Ltd, and a widely-shared X post this week goes further, alleging the firm is the same tech vendor, operating under a changed name, that was behind Telangana’s 2019 results crisis, in which the post claims 300,000-plus students faced discrepancies and around 20 student suicides were linked to the fallout.

The board’s defence is that OSM is just a different surface for an unchanged evaluation; the lived experience for many students is that this is the first marking system that has visibly broken in public before the appeals window has even closed, with a separate question now opened about who built the platform in the first place.

Funding & Acquisitions

Partnerships & Strategic Initiatives

Policy & Government

Opinions

Others

Job Openings

Note: Article URLs are occasionally modified by news agencies and may result in 404 errors. Searching the summary text should help locate the related story.